Founding Partner
About 1,250 Merax Full-Size and Twin-Size Murphy Beds Are Being Recalled After Federal Safety Officials Warned That Their Frames Can Fall During Assembly or Disassembly, Creating Potentially Deadly Impact, Crush, and Laceration Hazards.
Consumers who purchased certain Merax Murphy beds are being told to stop using them immediately following a nationwide recall involving a potentially deadly falling-bed hazard. On August 13, 2026, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission announced that GigaCloud Technology (USA) Inc. was recalling approximately 1,250 Merax full-size and twin-size Murphy beds because the frame of the wall bed can fall onto consumers during assembly or disassembly. The federal agency warns that the defect presents impact, crushing, and laceration hazards capable of causing serious injury or death.
The danger is not merely theoretical. According to the CPSC, two incidents have already been reported in which Murphy beds fell during assembly while the beds were not anchored to the wall. Both incidents resulted in injuries. One consumer suffered bruising to the head, neck, and right shoulder. Another consumer was struck in the head and suffered scrapes and bruising to the arms.
These accidents raise important questions for consumers because a large Murphy-bed structure can carry substantial weight and may generate tremendous force if it suddenly falls. A person standing beneath or beside the structure during installation could suffer injuries far more serious than bruising, including traumatic brain injuries, skull fractures, spinal injuries, broken bones, internal injuries, severe lacerations, or fatal crushing injuries.
People who purchased one of the recalled products should identify the model and SKU number and follow the recall instructions. Anyone who has already been injured may also want to preserve the product, packaging, assembly instructions, purchase records, photographs, medical documentation, and other evidence because those materials could become important if a product liability claim is pursued.
The recall covers specific white Merax full-size and twin-size Murphy beds designed to mount to a wall and fold upward into a cabinet. Approximately 1,250 units are affected.
The recalled products include:
Consumers should pay particular attention to the SKU number rather than relying entirely on the name shown on the product listing. The CPSC reports that essentially the same product may have been offered by marketplace sellers under other names, including Euroco, Harper & Bright Designs, Modern Luxe, Polibi, additional brand names, or no brand name at all. The identifying SKU sticker is located on the inside frame of the Murphy bed.
That detail is significant because someone may own a recalled bed without recognizing the Merax name. A customer who remembers buying a wall bed labeled Harper & Bright Designs or Modern Luxe, for example, should not automatically assume that the recall does not apply. Comparing the SKU number with the federal recall notice is a more reliable way to determine whether a particular bed is affected.
The breadth of the distribution is another reason this recall may affect consumers throughout the United States.
According to the CPSC, the recalled Murphy beds were sold online through Amazon.com, HomeDepot.com, Wayfair.com, Walmart.com, Target.com, Overstock.com, Temu.com, and other websites. Sales occurred between May 2024 and February 2026, with prices ranging from approximately $900 to $1,100.
A consumer therefore may have purchased one of these beds almost two years before the recall was announced. Some owners may no longer have the original packaging or remember the manufacturer’s name. Others may have purchased the furniture through a marketplace listing that displayed a different brand.
Purchase histories maintained by online retailers can become especially useful under these circumstances. Consumers who believe they may own an affected bed can check their old online orders, invoices, shipping confirmations, credit card records, instruction manuals, and photographs.
For someone who has already suffered an injury, these records can also help establish where and when the product was purchased and potentially identify businesses within its chain of distribution.
A Murphy bed differs substantially from an ordinary freestanding bed. Its defining characteristic is a folding mechanism that allows the mattress and supporting structure to move between a horizontal sleeping position and a vertical storage position.
That convenience also means the system must control a large moving structure safely.
The recalled Merax beds use a wall-mounted configuration. During assembly or disassembly, consumers may have to work directly beside, beneath, or within the path of substantial portions of the bed frame. If the structure becomes unstable before it is securely anchored, gravity can cause it to fall toward the person assembling it.
The CPSC specifically warns that the recalled bed frames can fall on consumers and create impact, crush, and laceration hazards.
An impact injury occurs when the falling structure strikes the body. Depending upon the weight, height, direction of movement, and body part involved, the resulting trauma can be severe. A blow to the head can cause a concussion, skull fracture, intracranial hemorrhage, or traumatic brain injury. Trauma to the neck or back can injure vertebrae, discs, nerves, or the spinal cord.
Crushing injuries present another concern. If a person becomes trapped beneath part of the structure, the force may damage bones, muscles, blood vessels, nerves, and internal organs. Severe crush injuries sometimes require emergency surgery and lengthy rehabilitation.
Sharp edges, hardware, frame components, or broken materials can also cause cuts and deep lacerations during a collapse. Depending on the circumstances, wounds may result in scarring, nerve damage, infection, or permanent impairment.
The two injuries publicly reported to date do not establish the maximum severity of the hazard. The CPSC expressly characterizes the condition as presenting a risk of serious injury or death.
The recall focuses on the danger presented during assembly and disassembly, particularly before the Murphy bed has been properly anchored to the wall.
According to the recall remedy, consumers who have not yet assembled their beds will receive a repair kit containing unloaded piston springs, revised assembly instructions, and inspection instructions. Consumers whose beds are already assembled will receive inspection instructions. If an inspection shows that a bed was assembled incorrectly, GigaCloud Technology says it will provide a professional installer to correct or complete the installation without charge.
Those measures provide important information about the nature of the safety concern.
Murphy-bed systems rely on mechanical components and installation procedures that must work together correctly. If springs or pistons exert force on the bed structure before it is safely secured, an installer could face an unexpected load during assembly. Likewise, instructions must adequately communicate the order in which components should be installed, secured, loaded, or released.
A product injury investigation may therefore go beyond asking whether the final assembled bed was correctly attached to a wall. Attorneys may examine the entire installation process and determine whether the product exposed an ordinary consumer to an unreasonable hazard while following the supplied instructions.
Questions may include whether the design unnecessarily created instability during assembly, whether spring forces could have been eliminated or controlled earlier in the process, whether the assembly sequence was reasonably safe, and whether warnings adequately communicated the danger of the frame falling before anchoring was complete.
A recall and a product liability lawsuit serve different purposes.
The CPSC recall seeks to reduce the risk of additional injuries by identifying affected products and providing a repair procedure. A civil lawsuit, by contrast, may seek compensation for a person who has already suffered injuries and financial losses.
A recall does not automatically establish that a manufacturer, importer, seller, or other company is legally responsible for every accident involving the product. Liability must be evaluated under the applicable law and facts of the individual case.
Depending on the state and circumstances, an injured consumer might pursue claims involving defective design, inadequate instructions or warnings, manufacturing defects, negligence, breach of warranty, or other available product liability theories.
A central issue may be whether the bed was reasonably safe when used or assembled in a reasonably foreseeable manner.
The assembly process may become especially important in these cases. A company that sells ready-to-assemble furniture should anticipate that consumers will perform the installation steps required by the product. If an unreasonable danger arises before the consumer can complete a required anchoring step, attorneys may investigate whether the design or instructions created an avoidable hazard.
A large furniture structure falling onto a person can cause injuries throughout the body. The type and severity of harm depend upon the force of the impact, where the frame strikes, whether the person falls afterward, and whether the victim becomes trapped.
Potential injuries may include traumatic brain injuries, concussions, skull fractures, facial injuries, cervical spine trauma, herniated discs, spinal fractures, spinal cord injuries, shoulder injuries, broken arms or wrists, rib fractures, internal organ damage, severe bruising, deep cuts, nerve injuries, and crush injuries.
Some victims may recover after emergency treatment and a period of rehabilitation. Others can face surgery, months of physical therapy, chronic pain, reduced range of motion, permanent neurological problems, or an inability to return to the same work.
The financial consequences can extend well beyond an initial emergency room bill. A serious injury can generate future medical expenses, rehabilitation costs, lost income, reduced earning capacity, and substantial out-of-pocket expenses.
The damages available after a defective-product injury depend upon the state where the claim is brought and the individual facts.
A person with a viable claim may potentially seek compensation for past and future medical expenses, lost wages, reduced earning capacity, physical pain, mental suffering, disability, disfigurement, and other recognized losses.
If a falling bed causes a fatal injury, surviving relatives or the decedent’s estate may have wrongful death or survival claims. The damages permitted in those cases differ significantly among states and can include funeral and burial expenses, lost financial support, loss of companionship or services, and other losses recognized under state law.
Punitive damages may be available in some jurisdictions when evidence meets a much higher legal threshold involving particularly wrongful conduct. They are not available merely because a recall occurred.
A careful damages analysis should account for both the injuries already sustained and the reasonable long-term consequences of those injuries.
Every state imposes deadlines for filing personal injury and product liability actions.
These statutes of limitation are not uniform. Different rules may apply depending on the state, age of the injured person, type of defendant, date of injury, date the injury was discovered, and other circumstances.
Some jurisdictions also have statutes of repose that can restrict claims after a specified number of years measured from the manufacture, sale, or delivery of a product regardless of when an injury occurs.
For that reason, consumers should not assume that the August 13, 2026 recall date starts the legal filing period. In many cases, the relevant deadline may be based on the date of injury rather than the date of the federal recall.
Determining the applicable filing deadline is one of the first issues that should be addressed after a serious product-related injury.
A piece of furniture designed for use inside a home should not place a consumer at risk of being struck or crushed while following the required assembly process. When a wall bed weighing enough to cause serious trauma falls unexpectedly, injuries can affect a victim’s health, employment, finances, and quality of life long after the accident itself.
If you or a family member was struck, crushed, cut, or otherwise injured while assembling, disassembling, installing, or using a Merax Murphy bed or a substantially similar wall bed sold under another name, Parker Waichman LLP can investigate what happened.
Our attorneys can examine the recalled product, assembly instructions, mechanical components, purchase records, medical evidence, distribution history, and other available evidence to determine what legal claims may be available. We can also investigate the companies that manufactured, imported, distributed, branded, or sold the product and pursue compensation when the evidence and applicable law support a claim.
Parker Waichman LLP represents injured consumers nationwide in product liability and serious personal injury cases. There is no charge for an initial consultation.
Call Parker Waichman LLP at 1-800-YOUR-LAWYER (1-800-968-7529) for a free consultation concerning a Merax Murphy bed injury or other serious injury involving a dangerous consumer product. Regardless of your location or where your injury occurred, our nationwide product injury law firm is ready to assist you.
Parker Waichman LLP
Our law firm is ready to represent you in your injury case. We’ve helped many New York residents as well as those needing help nationwide. Contact our team for a free case consultation today.
We have the experience and the skilled litigators to win your case. Contact us and speak with a real attorney who can help you.
We handle mass torts cases nationwide. Please contact our office to learn more.