Founding Partner
Roblox Corporation recently announced a series of major safety changes designed to strengthen protections for its younger users. These updates come at a time when the platform is facing significant legal pressure, including at least 35 lawsuits alleging that its systems failed to safeguard minors from predators and harmful interactions. The gaming platform, used by tens of millions of children and teens around the world, has been at the center of intense scrutiny from parents, state attorneys general, and federal courts over claims that the environment allowed predators to contact, groom, and exploit minors.
The announced safety measures include facial age checks, optional age-based chat controls, and tools for parents to confirm and adjust a child’s age. These updates are intended to shield minors from inappropriate interactions. Roblox hopes these changes set a new industry benchmark for platform safety.
The rollout of age verification technology and adjusted chat settings signals a shift in Roblox’s approach to safety, and the company emphasizes that it is “committed to setting the industry standard for safety.” However, legal advocates and families affected by abuse on the platform say that these changes address only a portion of a much larger problem. Many lawsuits remain active, and families are seeking accountability, compensation, and structural change.
This introduction sets the stage for a deeper understanding of why Roblox’s safety changes matter, how they are designed to work, and how they relate to ongoing litigation. For families whose children have been harmed, these developments may offer reassurance that the platform is attempting to adapt, but they do not erase past injuries. If your child was harmed on Roblox, you may have legal options and deserve to know what comes next.
Roblox has announced that it will implement several notable changes to how users are verified and how they communicate on the platform. These modifications are aimed primarily at preventing unsafe interactions between minors and adults.
One of the most significant elements of Roblox’s new safety plan is the introduction of Facial Age Estimation (FAE) technology. This system uses a device’s camera to analyze a user’s face and estimate age. Users may also verify age by providing a valid government‑issued ID, though the platform promises the process is “fast, easy, and secure.” Roblox claims that this technology allows the platform to more accurately match chat permissions and features to a user’s age group.
Once verified, users are assigned to one of several age categories:
After age verification, Roblox will automatically adjust in‑game chat features. For example:
Roblox also provides a “trusted connections” feature, allowing minor players to authorize connections with specific users outside their age group, such as siblings or family friends. This feature is optional and designed to give parents and guardians greater control over who their child may interact with on the platform.
Parents can access and change their child’s age information within the profile settings. This parent‑controlled system aims to ensure accuracy in age classification, enabling appropriate safety settings based on a child’s verified age.
Roblox plans a phased implementation of these changes, beginning in December 2025 in Australia, New Zealand, and the Netherlands. The remainder of the world, including the United States, will see the changes take effect in January 2026.
These safety updates represent a significant technological and policy investment by Roblox. The platform’s public statements emphasize its desire to cultivate “age‑appropriate environments” for all users, particularly its youngest members.
Despite its size and influence, Roblox’s safety model has been challenged by parents, legal professionals, and public officials due to a history of incidents in which minors were contacted by adult predators through the platform.
The most serious legal challenges against Roblox involve claims that the platform’s chat features and user‑generated worlds enabled predators to identify, contact, and exploit minors. Plaintiffs in these lawsuits argue that Roblox knew or should have known that its safety systems were insufficient. These claims include:
Several families have testified that predators initiated contact within Roblox and then moved conversations to external platforms, where oversight was limited or nonexistent. This pattern is often described as a failure of the platform to prevent foreseeable misuse of its systems.
These cases have been consolidated into a multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. MDLs allow similar claims to proceed together, enabling coordinated discovery and case management. As of late 2025, there have been no verdicts or settlements in these suits, and Roblox continues to deny that its platforms are inherently unsafe.
Another group of lawsuits alleges that Roblox’s design is deliberately addictive. Plaintiffs in these cases argue that:
These claims differ from the exploitation lawsuits in that they focus less on predatory contact and more on internal behavioral and emotional impacts of the platform’s design. A federal panel declined to consolidate these cases into an MDL due to differences in injuries and legal theories, so they proceed individually in various courts.
Roblox’s safety updates aim to create a more controlled environment for minor users while still preserving social interaction.
The introduction of facial age detection technology is intended to ensure that users are placed in appropriate age categories and thereby restrict chat features accordingly. The strength of this system is that it reduces reliance on self‑reported age, which many children misstate either intentionally or unintentionally. Verification through biometric technology or valid identification is designed to enhance accuracy.
However, critics note that no system is perfect. Facial age estimation may raise privacy concerns and may not always be accurate. Additionally, requiring children to scan their faces or provide identification raises questions about data storage, security, and consent.
By limiting chat interactions between age groups, Roblox aims to make it far more difficult for adults to contact minors without explicit permission or established relationships. Children under age 9, for example, will have chat disabled unless a parent consents through an age check and verification process.
For older minors, communication will be limited to users within similar age categories. Features like “trusted connections” give families flexibility to maintain relationships between siblings or family friends under controlled settings.
Roblox’s system allows parents to correct or confirm their child’s age and adjust settings accordingly. This added layer of oversight acknowledges that caretakers should have the authority to influence social interactions and messaging capabilities, particularly for younger children.
The phased rollout reflects an attempt by Roblox to implement these systems widely while managing technical and infrastructural challenges. Beginning in selected countries in late 2025 allows Roblox to test the system before expanding to a global user base in early 2026.
While these changes represent progress, legal advocates emphasize that they do not address all of the harms alleged in ongoing lawsuits. Plaintiffs maintain that prevention requires not only technology but also corporate accountability and more effective enforcement of safety standards.
The introduction of these safety features highlights the importance of parental involvement in children’s online activity. Parents and caregivers can take proactive steps to protect children and reinforce safe habits.
Parents should ensure that their child’s Roblox profile reflects accurate age information. Misstating a child’s age can inadvertently expose them to settings designed for older users. Through the platform’s parental controls, caregivers can view and adjust age categories to match real‑world ages.
Familiarity with Roblox’s age‑based chat options allows parents to determine which communication channels their child may use. For younger children, keeping chat disabled or restricted to “trusted connections” minimizes the opportunities for contact with strangers.
Parents should review chat logs periodically and have open discussions with their children about who they are communicating with on the platform.
Children should understand that not everyone online has good intentions. Parents can encourage children to:
In addition to safety settings, parents can establish healthy screen time boundaries, encourage offline activities, and monitor behavior changes that may indicate compulsive gaming.
If an adult user attempts to contact a child inappropriately, parents should report the incident to Roblox immediately and, when appropriate, to local law enforcement. Proper reporting increases the chance of timely intervention and evidence preservation.
While technology can provide safeguards, active supervision and communication between parents and children remain essential components of online safety.
Families whose children have been harmed on Roblox may have legal options that allow them to seek financial compensation and accountability from Roblox Corporation.
If a child was contacted or groomed by an adult on the platform, a lawsuit may be filed alleging that Roblox failed to provide adequate safety measures and knowingly allowed conditions that facilitated harm. Damages in these cases may include:
Parents of children who developed anxiety, depression, or clinical dysfunction due to excessive gameplay may pursue claims related to negligent design or failure to warn. These lawsuits often focus on:
State attorneys general in Kentucky, Louisiana, and Tennessee have filed lawsuits alleging deceptive and unfair business practices. These claims focus on Roblox’s marketing and representations about safety and may affect related private legal claims for harmed families.
Each state has its own deadlines for filing lawsuits, known as statutes of limitations. In many child abuse and exploitation cases, these time limits may be extended or tolled until the victim reaches adulthood. It is important for families to consult with a qualified attorney promptly to determine eligibility and filing windows.
What new safety measures has Roblox announced?
Roblox announced facial age verification, age‑based chat controls that restrict communications between minors and adults, and enhanced parental controls to manage age settings. These changes aim to reduce unsafe interactions and align chat permissions with verified age groups.
Why is Roblox facing lawsuits?
Roblox faces lawsuits alleging that its platform did not adequately protect children from online predators and that its design encouraged excessive or addictive use, causing psychological harm. State attorneys general have also filed claims alleging deceptive safety practices.
What is facial age verification, and how does it work?
Facial age verification uses a camera‑based scan or a valid ID to estimate a user’s age, ensuring that chat permissions and social features match the appropriate age group. Roblox promises the process is secure and optional.
Will these new features prevent all harmful interactions?
While age verification and chat restrictions reduce some risks, no system can guarantee complete safety. Children may still encounter inappropriate content, and responsible supervision by parents remains essential.
Can parents control their child’s age and settings?
Yes. Parents can view and adjust age settings within the child’s Roblox profile, which affects chat permissions and content accessibility.
What should I do if my child was harmed on Roblox?
Save all communication logs, messages, and screenshots. Document any psychological or behavioral changes and consult a personal injury attorney experienced with online harms and product safety cases.
Are there deadlines to file a lawsuit?
Yes. Statutes of limitations vary by state. Abuse and exploitation claims may have extended filing windows. An attorney can advise on the specific deadlines for your child’s case.
Is a class action lawsuit available for all victims?
Child exploitation lawsuits have been consolidated into multidistrict litigation in federal court. Addiction‑related cases are proceeding individually due to differences in claims.
If your child was harmed through exploitation, grooming, or psychological injury linked to Roblox Corporation’s platform, you may have legal rights and options. Parker Waichman LLP is a national personal injury law firm representing families across the United States in cases involving unsafe platforms and childhood harm. Our team offers free consultations to review your situation, answer questions, and explain what steps you can take. There are no fees unless we recover compensation for your family.
Call 1‑800‑YOUR‑LAWYER (1‑800‑968‑7529) today for a free, confidential case evaluation and justice on behalf of your child. Regardless of your location or where your injury occurred, our nationwide product injury law firm is ready to assist you.
Parker Waichman LLP
Our law firm is ready to represent you in your injury case. We’ve helped many New York residents as well as those needing help nationwide. Contact our team for a free case consultation today.
We have the experience and the skilled litigators to win your case. Contact us and speak with a real attorney who can help you.
Parker Waichman LLP
6 Harbor Park Drive
Port Washington, NY 11050
Parker Waichman LLP
201 Old Country Road – Suite 145
Melville, NY 11747
Parker Waichman LLP
300 Cadman Plaza West
One Pierrepont Plaza, 12th Floor
Brooklyn, NY 11201
Parker Waichman LLP
27299 Riverview Center Boulevard, Suite 108
Bonita Springs, FL 34134
We handle mass torts cases nationwide. Please contact our office to learn more.